Self-Based and Character-Based Ethics
According to my research on experiences, in the same period, I wrote on the success achieved in America since 1776. Was doing a deep study of literature. On topics such as self-improvement, folk mood and self-help Read hundreds of books, articles and contracts. To make a peaceful and democratic society a successful life. The keys used to agree, the essence of them all was on my finger. When I studied the material written in the last 200 years on success, I got one A strange pattern appeared. Since I was myself and I have been living with the lives of people from my surroundings and I had also seen that in relationships, so I realized that most of the last 50 years are related to success.
The literature was superficial. In this, awareness, techniques and quick solutions were given to create a social image. Were. In a way, this co-operative of success was full of social remedies such as social AIDS and APARAN, Through which efforts were made to solve serious problems. Although many times they have some problem Time was also solved, but in spite of this, the long-term problems remained. It kept spreading inside and emerging again and again. On the contrary, almost all the literature related to the success of the first 150 years was successful. He believed and was interested in the ethics of half-a-century. It includes patience, integrity, loyalty, restraint, courage,Emphasis was laid on the moral qualities such as impatience, patience, perseverance, simplicity, pomp and lawlessness.
Brajman celebrates the story of the Kalyan, the half-century policy. It is basically one such There is a story, which has established some theory and habit in its depth.
History teaches a few basic principles of an effective life and gives people Real success and lasting happiness can be realized only when they learn these principles,Take the gradient in the original feed. However, after the first world, the basic angle of success, aside from the four-pronged policy That thing happened at a time, which we can say is a half-based policy. Ava, Savajanak Chhavi, Nazareya and behavior came to be regarded as the basis of success. Success in facilitating social relations Worthiness and technique were based on. This Nava-nirat Nitshatha basically chose two
paths: (1) Techniques of folk-dealing in human and social relations, and (2) positive mental outlook.
Some part of the life philosophy and sometimes in the appropriate sun Success determines, “” Friends are more friends than friends, rather than offering, “and” Humans are in their own right. Whatever one can imagine and believe in the mind, he can also achieve that.” There were also other aspects of the Nava-Adhrit Nietasha, which were clearly misleading, even Used to cheat and encourage people to use these techniques only because people know them.
Like it People were encouraged to show lies in the literature of the world, so that they You can achieve your desired thing with them. Many times, people advise to “see successful” They were given or even crushed and the suggestion was made to move forward. In this literature, to some extent, the cycle was accepted as one of the elements of success, but Instead of considering it as basic and fertile, it can be seen to be isolated. Four-and-a-half Mention of Nitesha mostly became oral authority. Quick-witted Techniques, brainstorming strategies, communication skills and positive mindsets were on the way.
I started to realize that I and Saeja were trying to find a solution in relation to their son, His subconscious source was the same ninth-half policy. When I have a half-century of Nitesha and Fra- If I thought more deeply about the difference of policy, then I realized that the best of our children Said and my social life was affected by the behavior. At the core of our concern, this was our In fact, our son was not at the expected height. He was his own image, more than his son’s image. We Good and caring parents wanted to see a successful role in the role of the parents and maybe this is why our In the mind, such an image of the son was made. In our way of solving the problem and dealing with it, son of only Well-being was not a concern, but it was a bit confusing.
When Saina and I talked about this, we realized this painful feeling that our thinking about her But how much our students and women were feeling strong. We knew of a social comparison Udhyaya did not match our deep life values. Such objectives were taking us towards the center half the time. And eventually because of them, our son’s confidence was diminishing. That is why we have set our efforts on our own Committed to work – not on our own technique, but through our deepest objectives and our sons On experience. Instead of trying to change the son, we tried to stand apart. We this What do we want from him?